Chapter 05 · GenAI COMPASS Playbook, 2025

Your
game plan

You cannot write a fixed checklist for a threat that changes every quarter. You can build a loop that keeps working: look, understand, decide, move - then look again.

4 steps 4 threat profiles 11 min read

An isometric instrument: a round drum with a needle pivoting from the centre toward a raised rim, and a small crank at its side.
Four steps around a ring, one needle, a crank on the rim. The point is not the plan - it is the pointing again.
The loop

Four steps you keep repeating

Pick a step to see what it asks of you. Most teams are good at one of these and weak at the other three - usually strong on act, thin on observe.

Step 01 · Observe

Know what you run, and what is happening to it

You cannot secure a model nobody inventoried. This step is mostly paperwork, which is why it gets skipped.

  • Inventory every model, tool, and MCP server in use - including the ones bought on a card
  • Log prompts, tool calls, and outputs with a retention period you can defend
  • Ask staff what they actually use, anonymously. The list will be longer
  • Monitor for the aggregate patterns: volume, drift, unusual hours

Sign this step is broken: the first time you learn about an AI tool is in an incident report.

Four fronts

If you only do one thing

The four threats below need different first moves. Pick the front you are actually on, do the one thing, and only then worry about the rest.

Profile 01

Vulnerability exploitation

Classic intrusion, accelerated by AI-assisted reconnaissance and tooling. Your exposure is the internet-facing surface plus whatever the model can reach.

One thing Patch the exposed service this week, and remove one capability the agent did not strictly need.

Profile 02

Deepfakes and impersonation

Cloned voices and faces aimed at the people with authority to move money. The loss lands on a person, not a server.

One thing Announce the callback rule and the code word in the next team meeting - and use them once.

Profile 03

Disinformation

Fabricated statements in your name, moving markets or trust. The damage is time-sensitive and reputation-shaped.

One thing Pre-write one holding statement and name who may publish it. Minutes decide this one.

Profile 04

Agentic AI failure

An agent acting within its permissions and still causing harm, at machine speed, across systems nobody connected.

One thing Put a human approval in front of the single most irreversible action it can take.

Decide

Score it, then decide

Likelihood times impact, one to five each. The arithmetic is deliberately simple - this is a teaching scale for a conversation, not .

The severity scorer

Likelihood × impact
Score 9 / 25 Schedule it
Recommended action Put it in the next sprint. Add a test that covers the path.
The value is not the number. It is that two people who disagree about the number are forced to say which of likelihood or impact they disagree about.
The unglamorous part

Three documents you need

Every plan eventually runs into the same three questions: who approved this, what is it allowed to do, and what happens when it goes wrong. Three short documents answer all three, and none of them need a lawyer to draft.

01

The register

Every AI system, its owner, its data sources, and its capability list. One page per system. If a system is not on the register, it does not go to production.

02

The acceptance policy

What staff may and may not paste into a tool, and which approved tool exists for each task. A ban without an alternative is a policy that creates shadow AI.

03

The one-page incident plan

Who declares, who switches off, who calls the bank, who speaks publicly, and what the first hour looks like. Rehearse it once, then date it.

Sources

  • OWASP GenAI COMPASS Playbook (2025) - genai.owasp.org
  • The loop is the OODA decision cycle, applied here to generative AI risk. The severity scale is a teaching device, not a standard.